"In its purest form, truth is not a polite tap on the shoulder; it is a howling reproach."
--- Ted Koppel
Is truth always an ice cold bucket of water thrown onto an unsuspecting public? Can truth be a gentle recognition as well? Does a more genteel reaction make the revelation less significant?
Maybe this is where things got tangled up. The reaction to the revelation became more important than what was being revealed.
How many times have I thought something I wrote was good because the audience reaction was immediate rather than contemplative? Or maybe there was no immediate reaction at all, and I thought what I wrote didn't work. (Only to have the reaction come days later, after people thought about it for a while.)
In theater, the delayed reaction is harder to take. I want the applause now. But in publishing, the reaction doesn't have to be immediate because the form is more personal.
Theater is a communal form. If I'm the only one in the audience, I feel odd. The actors will hear me laugh, even it's not a laugh line.
Books are more personal. It's about reaching one person at a time. And I won't see the reaction as easily.
(BTW, I essentially agree with the above quote. And I also think that the reaction to a howling approach can be silence as well.)


