Sharp Schisms in Culture
I haven't written an original thought here in a while. My thinking cap is being harnessed for Project 1968, but I do want to weigh in on Isaac's comments on Sarah Ruhl.
This post will have little do with theater. I have never read a play by Sarah Ruhl; nor have I seen a performance of her work. But the backlash doesn't surprise me and here's why:
Our world situation is rapidly changing in ways that we have yet to understand.
Economically, things aren't going well. People are losing their homes, municipalities are in deep financial trouble, and gas has nearly doubled from what it was at the beginning of the Bush presidency. The war in Iraq continues. Venezuela and Columbia are in conflict.
When the culture sudden shifts, art that express old values are no longer valid. It's the reason why pop culture has to constantly reinvent itself. Art that hopes to transcend the present must be rooted in a universal experience. It must go beyond the expression of what's currently fashionable.
Reading what others have written about Ruhl's work, I suspect that's what people are picking up. The culture has shifted; the writer has not.
If current trends continue, I suspect that more of our almost past-tense culture will feel woefully dated. I don't think that's a bad thing.


